Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Henk Enting <h.d.ent...@mgrid.net> wrote:
>> We ran into a problem on 9.0beta3 with check constraints using table
>> inheritance in a multi-level hierarchy with multiple inheritance.
> Thanks for the report. This bug also appears to exist in 8.4; I'm not
> sure yet how far back it goes. I'm not so sure your proposed patch is
> the right fix, though; it seems like it ought to be the job of
> AddRelationNewConstraints() and MergeWithExistingConstraint() to make
> sure that the right thing happens, here.
The original design idea was that coninhcount/conislocal would act
exactly like attinhcount/attislocal do for multiply-inherited columns.
Where did we fail to copy that logic?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
