Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> So it'd definitely be a lot better than now. Maybe there'd be some >> remaining performance gap for non-pathological cases, but I think we >> would be willing to pay that in order to avoid bad behavior for the >> pathological cases. It's difficult to say for sure of course >> without going to the trouble of coding and testing it.
> Well, it sounds like a reasonable thing to try, then. You going to > take a crack at it? Yeah, I'll have at it. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers