Kevin Grittner írta: > Michael Meskes <mich...@fam-meskes.de> wrote: > >> All prior ECPG versions were fine because dynamic cursor names >> were only added in 9.0. Apparently only this one place was >> missed. So this is a bug in the new feature, however not such a >> major one that it warrants the complete removal IMO. I'd prefer to >> fix this in 9.0.1. >>
As we are so late in the beta phase, we can live with that, hopefully you will find time by then to review the patch which is actually not that complex, only a bit large. The part of ECPGdo() that deals with auto-preparing statements is moved closer to calling ecpg_execute(), after the varargs are converted to stmt->inlist and ->outlist. >> Hope this cleans it up a bit. >> > > Thanks. I think I get it now. > > To restate from another angle, to confirm my understanding: UPDATE > WHERE CURRENT OF is working for cursors with the name hard-coded in > the embedded statement, which is the only way cursor names were > allowed to be specified prior to 9.0; 9.0 implements dynamic cursor > names, allowing you to use a variable for the cursor name; but this > one use of a cursor name isn't allowing a variable yet. Do I have > it right? (If so, I now see why it would be considered a bug.) > Yes, you understand it correctly. Best regards, Zoltán Böszörményi -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
