2010/8/6 Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net>: > On fre, 2010-08-06 at 21:31 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote: >> It must not be a function. Just I missing any tool that helps with >> complex structured data. This proposed kind functions has one >> advantage - there isn't necessary any change in parser. Yes, I can use >> a pair of arrays, I can use a one array with seq name, value, I can >> use a custom parser. But nothing from these offers a comfort or >> readability for example a Perl's hash tables. > > Maybe you should just use PL/XSLT. :-) > :)
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
