Mike Fowler <m...@mlfowler.com> writes:
> On 06/08/10 20:55, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On fre, 2010-08-06 at 09:04 +0100, Mike Fowler wrote:
>>> If the patch is to be committed, does it make sense for me to refine
>>> it such that it uses the new xpath internal function you extracted in
>>> the xmlexists patch?
>>
>> Yes, you can probably shrink this patch down to about 20 lines.
> Updated the patch so that it will apply to head and re-worked the
> function to use the new xpath internal function.
Applied with minor corrections (improved docs, fixed regression tests,
adjusted OIDs for CVS HEAD).
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
