On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 23:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Jim Nasby <j...@nasby.net> wrote: > >> So there's no way to see if a particular privilege has been granted to > >> public. ISTM 'public' should be accepted, since you can't use it as a role > >> name anyway... > > > It's a bit sticky - you could make that work for > > has_table_privilege(name, oid, text) or has_table_privilege(name, > > text, text), but what would you do about the versions whose first > > argument is an oid? > > Nothing. The only reason to use those forms is in a join against > pg_authid, and the "public" group doesn't have an entry there.
ISTM this bug should be on the open items list... -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
