On 11/08/10 14:44, Simon Riggs wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 13:25 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
I concur that Boxuan's suggested "difficult" approach seems like the
right one.
Right, but you've completely ignored my proposal: lets do this in two
pieces. Get what we have now ready to commit, then add support for
partitioning later, as a second project.
It seems like a pretty serious omission. What would you do, thrown a
"MERGE to inherited tables not implemented" error?
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
