Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> AFAICS the version in mbprint.c is flat out wrong, and the only reason >> nobody's noticed is that it should never get passed a more-than-4-byte >> sequence anyway.
> Should we fix it, then, and if so how far should we go back? Yes, I'd vote for back-patching, at least to all versions in which the wchar.c version looks like that. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers