Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> I'm not sure whether there is any clear rule for what rows you get when > >> grouping by a non-PK column in mysql, but it'll let you do it. > > > I understand this. The issue is how many people who complained about > > our GROUP BY behavior were grouping by something that was a primary key, > > and how many were not using a primary key? The former will no longer > > complain. > > No doubt, but the TODO entry you removed is still 100% accurately > worded, and what's more the archive entry it links to clearly describes > exactly the point at issue, namely that grouping by a PK *isn't* > indeterminate. You were wrong to remove it.
OK, I put it back, but I still feel we might not need it anymore. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
