Fernando Nasser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If some types are really important and operators are desired, it can be
> coordinated with the DBA as operators would be a database wide resource.
> (This would be the case if indices extensions were involved anyway).
No, there isn't any particular reason that index extensions should be
considered database-wide resources; if operators are named local to
schemas, then opclasses can be too, and that's all you need.
In practice maybe it doesn't matter; I doubt anyone would try to
implement an indexable datatype in anything but C, and to define
C functions you must be superuser anyway. But this does not seem
to me to be a good argument why operator names should be global.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
