Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > Now you might suggest that the function itself is redundant with the > information given in the FunctionScan node line and so we need only > show the argument list. Unfortunately there are cases where this fails; > in particular, the named function could have been "inlined" by the > planner, meaning that the actual expression could be just about anything > at all. So I think that trying to be cute is a bad idea and we should > just print the nodetree as-is.
Oh. +1 then. Regards, -- dim -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
