Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> However, that's something for 9.1 and beyond. Bruce's immediate problem > >> is what to do in pg_upgrade in 9.0, and there I concur that he should > >> duplicate what pg_regress is doing. > > > OK, here is a patch that sets all the variables that pg_regress.c sets. > > I certainly hope that pg_regress isn't freeing the strings it passes > to putenv() ...
pg_regress does not restore these settings (it says with C/English) so the code is different. -- Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
