On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> The code that bothered me about the CREATE DATABASE param processing
> was:
>
> /* process additional options */
> foreach(l, $5)
> {
> List *optitem = (List *) lfirst(l);
>
> switch (lfirsti(optitem))
> {
> case 1:
> n->dbpath = (char *) lsecond(optitem);
> break;
> case 2:
> n->dbtemplate = (char *) lsecond(optitem);
> break;
> case 3:
> n->encoding = lfirsti(lnext(optitem));
> break;
> case 4:
> n->dbowner = (char *) lsecond(optitem);
> break;
> }
> }
>
> I see what it is doing, but it seems quite unclear. Seeing that people
> are using this as a pattern for other param processing, I will work on a
> patch to convert this to DefElem.
Wouldn't a few macros clean this up better (ie, make it clearer)?
#define CDBOPTDBPATH 1
#define optparam(l) (char *)lsecond(l)
#define optparami(l) (int)lfirsti(lnext(l))
foreach(l, $5)
{
List *optitem = (List *) lfirst(l);
switch (lfirsti(optitem))
{
case CDBOPTDBPATH:
n->dbpath = optparam(optitem);
break;
...
Regardless, I guess that code is pointless since the consensus seems to be
that the use of DefElem is better since it allows for the abstraction of
the parameters list. Obviously a good thing if CREATE DATABASE, COPY etc
are to be extended often enough.
Gavin
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
