On 07/09/10 16:47, Tom Lane wrote: > Max Bowsher <m...@f2s.com> writes: >> Personally, the idea of trying to use git-filter-branch to make what >> cvs2git currently gives you more sensible scares me silly. > > I'm not excited about it either --- but if Magnus wants to experiment, > no harm trying. > >> Another glitch that might be worth fixing before you convert is the way >> that cvs2git says "This commit was manufactured by cvs2svn to create >> branch", when it actually means "manufactured to incrementally create >> the branch state as it appears in CVS" - i.e. many of these commits >> actually update an existing branch. Just as soon as I can figure out how >> to cleanly fit that into cvs2git's structure, I want it to change the >> word "create" to "update" in most of those commits. > > I thought all of those message texts were taken from the configuration > file.
Yes, but currently these two cases both reference the same entry in the configuration file. Max.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
