On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 22:06, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: >>> You're saying you don't "require" a fix on the latest issue here? Or >>> should we spend some time trying to figure out if we can fix it with >>> git-filter-branch? >> >> I think that "the latest issue here" is the issue of how files get >> added to branches, which we discussed before with pretty much the same >> set of conclusions. I'm not wild about the way that's getting >> converted, but I'm not sure I care enough about it to argue with Tom. >> However, I want to convince myself that the deletes we've done over >> the years have been properly handled. I need to look at Max's latest >> conversion and I'll look at yours as well. > > Magnus - > > I just looked at your latest conversion (based on what Max did) and it > looks a lot better. I think, though, that we should re-remove these > branches: > > origin/unlabeled-1.44.2 > origin/unlabeled-1.51.2 > origin/unlabeled-1.59.2 > origin/unlabeled-1.87.2 > origin/unlabeled-1.90.2
Oh yeah, I did the push before I ran that step of my script. Oops, sorry. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
