Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurj...@gmail.com> writes:
>> Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California
> Is that line needed for new files introduced by the Community?
If you can show clearly that no part of a new file has any connection
to the historical Postgres code base, then no you wouldn't need to
include such a credit. But that seems like an improbable assumption
for most new code added to Postgres. By and large, I think we should
acknowledge our connections to the work that's gone before, not try
to deny that there's any.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
