On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 03:35:30PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote: > On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 20:14 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Heikki Linnakangas > > <hei...@postgresql.org> wrote: > > > Log Message: > > > ----------- > > > Use a latch to make startup process wake up and replay immediately when > > > new WAL arrives via streaming replication. This reduces the latency, and > > > also allows us to use a longer polling interval, which is good for energy > > > efficiency. > > > > > > We still need to poll to check for the appearance of a trigger file, but > > > the interval is now 5 seconds (instead of 100ms), like when waiting for > > > a new WAL segment to appear in WAL archive. > > > > Good work! > > No, not good work. > > You both know very well that I'm working on this area also and these > commits are not agreed... yet. They might not be contended but they are > very likely to break my patch, again. > > Please desist while we resolve which are the good ideas and which are > not. We won't know that if you keep breaking other people's patches in a > stream of commits that prevent anybody completing other options.
Simon, No matter how many times you try, you are not going to get a license to stop all work on anything you might chance to think about. It is quite simply never going to happen, so you need to back off. Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
