Thom Brown wrote:
> > VACUUM mvcc_demo;
> > VACUUM
> > SELECT pg_relation_size('mvcc_demo');
> > ?pg_relation_size
> > ------------------
> > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?0
> > (1 row)
> >
>
> That's odd. When I delete val 2, the freespace goes back up in 9.0rc1
> (attached).
Your numbers are odd too. With one row after INSERT you show:
(0,8128)
but after delete you with one row left you show:
(0,8096)
You also dip to (0,8032), which I don't see. I now see we only track
range of free space values. For example, freespace.c has:
* We use just one byte to store the amount of free space on a page, so we
* divide the amount of free space a page can have into 256 different
* categories. The highest category, 255, represents a page with at least
* MaxFSMRequestSize bytes of free space, and the second highest category
* represents the range from 254 * FSM_CAT_STEP, inclusive, to
* MaxFSMRequestSize, exclusive.
*
* MaxFSMRequestSize depends on the architecture and BLCKSZ, but assuming
* default 8k BLCKSZ, and that MaxFSMRequestSize is 24 bytes, the categories
* look like this
*
*
* Range Category
* 0 - 31 0
* 32 - 63 1
* ... ... ...
* 8096 - 8127 253
* 8128 - 8163 254
* 8164 - 8192 255
So, my guess is that the unused item pointers are causing the free space
to fall into a smaller category than we had after the first INSERT. I
bet if I pulled more columns from heap_page_items() I could see it.
Anyway, I think I have my explaination now. Thanks.
--
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
