Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > What you just said is about what I had in mind. I admit I can't > articulate a more detailed design right off the top of my head, but > the architecture you're proposing seems dead certain to never cover > more than 0.1% of what people actually do.
Well, considering what we have now, the proposal is solid enough for me. As far as supporting VACUUM or REINDEX operations, my feeling is that offering a way to report current block being worked on and being able to see that move is enough a progress indication. We know for sure we won't be able to provide a reliable progress bar, and I don't think adopting the famous windows time units (the longest remaining second known) would do any good for the project. Regards, -- dim -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
