On 09/20/2010 06:09 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote: > Yeah, I mostly followed that thread. If such a feature was present, > it might well make sense to use it for this; however, I've got > enough trouble selling the SSI technology without making it > dependent on something else which was clearly quite controversial, > and which seemed to have some technical hurdles of its own left to > clear. :-/
Okay, well understandable. I'm wondering how you want to implement the memory allocation part, though. > At the point where there is an implementation which is accepted by > the community, I'll certainly take another look. Fair enough, thanks. Regards Markus Wanner -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
