On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 18:47, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Done. The commit hook seems to be a bit verbose about that sort of >>> thing ... is it worth trying to collapse the pgsql-committers messages >>> into one email? > >> I was thinking the same thing, until I realized that pushing a whole >> boatload of tags at the same time is probably going to be an extremely >> rare event. > > True. We will be creating four or five tags at a time during > back-branch update cycles, but those might well arrive in separate > pushes anyway, depending on how Marc chooses to arrange his workflow.
I could look into if it's possible to group the tags together if they come in a single push. I'm not entirely sure it's possible (I don't know if the commitmsg script gets called once in total or once for each), but I could look into it. However, I agree with Robert I doubt it's worth it. I definitely don't want to group the commits together, and then suddenly tags and commits are handled differently... -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
