Magnus Hagander wrote: > >> I assume most buildfarm clients are off static IPs (at least as seen > >> from the servers - they may be behind a NAT device, but that one > >> having static out)? If so, it seems simply easier to use pserver... > >> > > > > Yes, I think we should have a VM. Is that so hard to do in these days of Xen > > etc? I'm surprised we can't run up a VM pretty much at the drop of a hat. > > In the new infrastructure, it is. > > The main resource that's limited really is IP addresses ;) > > > > I was suggesting that the accounts would be protected using ssh keys. > > Password and IP address protection seem pretty weak to me. Passwords can be > > sniffed or attacked using brute force. IP addresses can be spoofed. But > > you're the SA, not me. > > I prefer keys. But I don't want those users on the same VM as > important services, because passphrase-less keys are a lot more likely > to be compromised than the keys of say a regular committer...
Stupid question, but can't we just create a CVSROOT fed from git, and use the normal CVS server to feed sites? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
