Alexandre Dulaunoy wrote: > > Not open for discussion. See the FAQ. > > I love that type of respond ;-) > > Yes, I have read the faq. The 1.2 is not responding why the modified > Berkeley-style BSD license was choosen. There is only a respond :"because > is like that..." > > I have also read that : > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2000-07/msg00210.php > > My question is more regarding the recent issue of RF license for some > specific patents. As described in my previous message, "copyleft" type > license has some advantages around the RF licensing issue.
Yes, GPL has advantages, but it does prevent non-source distributions. You can say that is not a problem, but not everyone agrees. > Could you extend the FAQ (1.2) with more arguments ? No. The discussion thread was painful enough. :-) -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
