Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > >> Josh Berkus wrote: > >>> It would be a good project to add to the list of "easy TODOs to get > >>> started with." > > >> Except for the pg_upgrade issue. > > > Which is a big "except". > > Yeah. That constraint is what leads me to think that the return on > effort is just not worth it. Maybe we should file this in the category > of "things to look at next time we break on-disk compatibility".
Yes, I would like to see such a category on the TODO list. Should I do it? FYI, I am please at the lack of serious problems with pg_upgrade. People are obviously using it because the are filing bug reports, but none of them are serious, and relate to pilot error or odd configurations. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
