On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 11:43 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > > To get zero data loss *and* continuous availability, you need two > > standbys offering sync rep and reply-to-first behaviour. > > Yes, that is a good point. > > I'm starting to understand what your proposal was all about. It makes > sense when you think of a three node system configured for high > availability with zero data loss like that. > > The use case of keeping hot standby servers up todate in a cluster > where > read-only queries are distributed across all nodes seems equally > important though. What's the simplest method of configuration that > supports both use cases?
That is definitely the right question. (More later) -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
