On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takah...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think the patch is almost ready to commit, but still > have some comments for the usability and documentations. > I hope native English speakers would help improving docs.
I'm checking the latest patch for applying. I found we actually use maintenance_work_mem for the sort in seqscan+sort case, but the cost was estimated based on work_mem in the patch. I added internal cost_sort_with_mem() into costsize.c. > * Documentation could be a bit more simplified like as > "CLUSTER requires twice disk spaces of your original table". > The added description seems too difficult for standard users. I re-ordered some description in the doc. Does it look better? Comments and suggestions welcome. -- Itagaki Takahiro
sorted_cluster-20100928.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
