Pavel Stehule <[email protected]> writes:
> 2010/9/28 Tom Lane <[email protected]>:
>> But I guess you could get around that if you had to by putting the ARRAY
>> expression inside parens, and it would be a pretty darn unusual case
>> anyway. Â So this is probably the best choice.
> I don't agree - There isn't reason for complicating proposed syntax.
Yes, there is. The syntax you propose is flat out ambiguous: there are
two possible legal interpretations of some commands. That's not
acceptable, especially not when it's so easily fixed.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
