On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 20:38 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: > > > > That looks contrary to the documented behavior. Shouldn't i get a forced > > disconnect on this connection instead? > > Probably yes. To do that, ISTM that we should make ALTER DATABASE .. RENAME > issue something like XLOG_DBASE_RENAME record, and make the standby server > call ResolveRecoveryConflictWithDatabase() when that record is applied. > Simon?
Certainly contrary to documented behaviour, thanks for the report. Question: do we want that documented behaviour, or should we leave it as is? Probably want to throw a conflict, but it seems worth asking, since I know for certain I just made up the documented behaviour. I'll patch if we agree its required. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
