On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > The problem is how much WAL is stored on (any) node. Currently that is > wal_keep_segments, which doesn't work very well, but I've seen no better > ideas that cover all important cases.
What about allowing the master to read and send WAL from the archive? Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
