On 10/07/2010 01:08 PM, Simon Riggs wrote: > Adding timeout is very little code. We can take that out of the patch if > that's an objection.
Okay. If you take it out, we are at the wait-forever option, right? If not, I definitely don't understand how you envision things to happen. I've been asking [1] about that distinction before, but didn't get a direct answer. Regards Markus Wanner [1]: Re: Configuring synchronous replication, Markus Wanner: http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4c9c5887.4040...@bluegap.ch -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
