* Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote: > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > > This might be overly pedantic, but I don't think 'tampering' gives the > > right impression. > > I'm open to suggestions.
Yeah, wasn't coming up with a better word myself. :/ Maybe something
with "circumvented"?
> > Also, even if you can't create functions (due to lack of create
> > privileges on any schema), you could use DO clauses now. Revoking
> > usage rights on all languages should prevent both though.
>
> I don't see how to make it work with a DO clause.
Yeah, Heikki pointed out that I was assuming PG could work more magic
than it can today. :) Sorry for the noise.
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
