On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Sander Steffann wrote: > At the moment all our DBs are on one partition.
Not really, no. It's easy to put in a symlink to put a database on another partition. It's easy for any object, for that matter, so long as it's not the sort of thing that gets deleted and re-created by users. > That is true, but when I look at how many of our customers actually use temp > tables, I think this is not a very big problem (for us!) Oh, of course! I was still in SQL Server mode, thinking that sorts were done via temp tables. But of course Postgres doesn't do it this way. > I don't know if there are any other places where > a user can eat resources, but the more I think about it, the more > complicated it gets. :-( Yeah, exactly. cjs -- Curt Sampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light. --XTC ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
