"Kevin Grittner" <[email protected]> writes:
> David Fetter <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Please find enclosed a WIP patch from one of my co-workers
>> intended to support JDBC's setQueryTimeout, along with the patch
>> for JDBC that uses it.
> I agree that it would be very nice to support this JDBC feature, but
> I'm not clear on why this can't be done with just JDBC changes using
> the java.util.Timer class and the existing Statement.cancel()
> method. Can you explain why the backend needed to be touched?
... and, if you are seriously expecting to have that happen, why the
patch was submitted to pgsql-jdbc not pgsql-hackers? I hadn't even
read it because I assumed it was strictly a JDBC change.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
