Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Reduction of contention for pg_clog access, for one thing. If you read
>> the archives, you'll find that pg_clog access contention has been shown
>> to be one cause of "context swap storms".
> I wonder if we could improve this with some sort of process-local
> cache - not to get rid of hint bits, just to reduce pg_clog
> contention. We might easily end up testing the same XID many times
> during the same table scan.
There already is a one-entry cache --- see TransactionLogFetch. Not
sure if making it bigger would be a win in current usage, although
you'd likely have to if you were trying to not set hint bits.
> Another idea that's been discussed before is to avoid writing out
> pages when only the hit bints have changed.
Yeah.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
