On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 3:59 AM, Pavel Stehule <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> [ updated patch, in response to a review from Itagaki Takahiro ]
>
> This patch appears to be waiting for a second round of review.
> Itagaki-san, are you planning to do that?
I can, but I was waiting for other people's comments about the design:
- format() in core, that implements %s, %i, and %l.
- substitute() for $n format and sprintf() that partially implements
the same function in C in contrib/stringfunc.
I don't like having three similar functions for the same purpose,
but Pavel said they are the best solutions. What will be our consensus?
--
Itagaki Takahiro
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
