Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takah...@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Alvaro Herrera > <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote: >> Lets rename the directory.
> Hmmm, but we call it 'xml2' in the doc. There is no 'pgxml' at all in it. > http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/xml2.html > However, I don't think we can change the module name because pg_upgrade > will fail if the module (.so) name was changed. So, it might be the > point of compromise to keep two names until we deprecate it completely. If the extensions manager is dependent on the assumption that a module's name matches the name of the directory it's built in, that assumption needs to be removed anyway. There are too many use-cases where that wouldn't hold, even if we try to force the standard contrib modules to follow such a rule. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
