Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> wrote: > When using locks in an unconventional way, it would be helpful to > describe the invalid schedules that you're preventing. Perhaps an > example if you think it would be reasonably simple? Also some > indication of how another process is intended to modify the list > without walking it. I've just pushed some comment changes intended to address this. Did I hit the mark? -Kevin P.S. Sorry for the delay in responding to such simple requests -- I've been tied up with a family medical crisis; I hope to crank through much of what you've raised this weekend.
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
