Tom Lane wrote: > Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > ...Based on that data, I'd vote against making any changes to NAMEDATALEN. > > It looked to me like the cost for going to NAMEDATALEN = 64 would be > reasonable. Based on these numbers I'd have a problem with 128 or more. > > But as you observe, pgbench numbers are not very repeatable. It'd be > nice to have some similar experiments with another benchmark before > making a decision.
Yes, 64 looked like the appropriate value too. Actually, I was surprised to see as much of a slowdown as we did. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
