On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 21:20, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Marti Raudsepp <ma...@juffo.org> writes: >> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 20:13, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> If open_dsync is so bad for performance on Linux, maybe it's bad >>> everywhere? Should we be rethinking the default preference order? > >> So I think we should aim to fix old versions first. Do you disagree? > > What's that got to do with it?
I'm not sure what you're asking. Surely changing the default wal_sync_method for all OSes in maintenance releases is out of the question, no? Regards, Marti -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
