On 11/10/2010 07:51 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
(And no, don't you dare breathe a word about git making that
all automagically better. I have enough back-patching experience with
git by now to be unimpressed; in fact, I notice that its rename-tracking
feature falls over entirely when trying to back-patch further than 8.3.
Apparently there's some hardwired limit on the number of files it can
cope with.)
That's very sad. Did you file a bug?
It's intentional behavior. It gives up when there are too many
differences to avoid being slow.
We should adopt that philosophy. I suggest we limit all tables in future
to 1m rows in the interests of speed.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
