Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > On 11/12/2010 01:11 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Josh Berkus wrote: > >> On 10/08/2010 02:44 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > >>>> In any case, I would expect that GIN could actually do this quite > >>>> efficiently. What we'd probably want is a concept of a "null word", > >>>> with empty indexable rows entered in the index as if they contained the > >>>> null word. So there'd be just one index entry with a posting list of > >>>> however many such rows there are. > >> So, given the lack of objections to this idea, do we have a plan for > >> fixing GIN? > > Is this a TODO? > > Yes.
OK, can you add it or give me wording, or it is already on the TODO list? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
