Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes:
> Is there a particular reason why track_functions is disabled by default?
Performance worries, plus the thought that not everyone cares to
have these stats.
> Does having it at 'pl' by default create a noticable overhead for
> people who aren't using pl functions? Or for that matter, even a
> noticable overhead for those that *are*?
I think we determined it did; and as for those who aren't using pl
functions, there'd be no benefit to such a change anyway.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
