On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 02:00:33PM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote: > > Yeah, you'd have to allow a flag to control the behavior. And in > > that case I'd rather the flag have a single default rather than > > different defaults depending on whether or not individual tables > > were selected. Something like --omit-unlogged-data. > > Are you sure we don't want to default the other way?
+1 for defaulting the other way. Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
