Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes:
> On mån, 2010-11-15 at 23:34 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It's clear to me that we are very far from having a handle on what
>> it'll really take to run parallel builds safely, and I am therefore
>> now of the opinion that we ought to revert the patch.
> We don't have to revert it, we just have to insert .NOTPARALLEL targets
> into some places that are not properly "parallelized", thus effectively
> restoring the behavior of the old for loop. I have attached a patch
> that gets make -j 100+ working for me. Other platforms might need more
> things, perhaps.
If we don't have to revert it entirely, that's of course better. Please
apply what you've got.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
