Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> writes:
> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mié nov 17 12:20:06 -0300 2010:
>> What's the point of the InvalidOid check?
> If the check is not there, the calling query will have to prevent the
> function from being called on rows having OID=0 in pg_depend. (These
> rows show up in the catalog for pinned objects).
Hmm. It would be good to document that motivation somewhere. Also,
for my own taste it would be better to do
/* for "pinned" items in pg_depend, return null */
if (!OidIsValid(catalogId))
PG_RETURN_NULL();
... straight line code here ...
rather than leave the reader wondering whether there are any other cases
where the function is intended to return null.
Oh, one other gripe: probably better to name it pg_describe_object.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
