Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> writes:
> this note was a different -only a few people use FOR IN SELECT UNNEST
> for iteration over array. So from Robert's question (what is important
> for current code?) perspective the more significant is access to
> individual fields via subscripts. For example:
> for i in 1..10000 loop
> s := s + A[i];
> end loop
> is slow, when high limit of array is some bigger number > 1000.
True, but inventing new FOR syntax isn't going to help people who are
used to doing that.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
