On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > NOTE that I *do* think that #1 is what *should* happen, but there should > be some way of turning off that behaviour so that we don't screw up ppl > expecting "Oracles behaviour" ...
I don't think this follows. If it's only for people's expectations, but we default to #1, their expectations will be violated until they figure out that the option is there. After they figure out it's there, well, they don't expect it to behave like Oracle any more, so they don't need the switch, right? cjs -- Curt Sampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light. --XTC ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
