Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of vie nov 19 12:25:13 -0300 2010: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The patch is touching protocol.sgml as follows. Isn't this enough? > > > How about some updates to the "Message Flow" section, especially the > > section on "COPY Operations"? > > Yeah. You're adding a new fundamental state to the protocol; it's not > enough to bury that in the description of a message format. I don't > think a whole lot of new verbiage is needed, but the COPY section needs > to point out that this is a different state that allows both send and > receive, and explain what the conditions are for getting into and out of > that state.
Is it sane that the new message has so specific a name? -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
