On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:16, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > To have a chance of getting a significant portion > of this into PostgreSQL 9.1, it really needs to be broken up into > INDEPENDENTLY COMMITTABLE SUB-PATCHES.
Did we discuss about syntax-only patch is not acceptable because it makes the head broken state at the previous commit-fest? I think that's why the patch becomes so large. So, our guideline to submit a large patch would be: * Split patch into commitable sub-patches (2000 lines each), * But submit a series of patches at once. Am I understanding correctly? -- Itagaki Takahiro -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
