Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Nov 27, 2010, at 2:49 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote:
>> Who's going to be the first to say that being git-centric can't ever be
>> a bad thing? ;-)
> At least for me, referring to it that way makes finding the original patch an
> order of magnitude faster (git show hash). YMMV.
[ shrug... ] You need to take the long view here. We're not working on
the assumption that git is the last SCM this project will ever use.
Even granting that it is, I don't think git hashes are adequately stable;
loading the code into a different repository would likely result in new
hashes. And AFAIK there is no mechanism that would fix hash references
embedded in commit log messages (or the code).
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
